If you’ve owned a Google Pixel at any point in the last few years, there’s a good chance you’ve run into one persistent frustration: weak connectivity. Despite their stellar cameras and clean Android experience, Pixel phones have long struggled with dropped calls, poor 5G reception, and random signal hiccups — issues that have trailed the lineup since the first Tensor chip.
Now, rumors suggest the upcoming Pixel 11 could take a bold new direction by switching to a MediaTek M90 modem. And that raises a big question: Can this finally fix the Pixel’s weakest link?
The Pixel’s Modem Problem
Google’s custom Tensor chips — built in partnership with Samsung — have always relied on Exynos-based modems, and that’s where much of the trouble starts.
Pixel users across Reddit threads, carrier forums, and tech reviews have repeatedly complained about spotty reception and faster battery drain compared to phones powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon modems. Some Pixels even tend to overheat during long data sessions or when switching between 5G and 4G networks.
It’s been a persistent issue, one that’s held back an otherwise excellent smartphone experience. Even Pixel 8 Pro owners have admitted that while the phone shines in photography, it still falls short in network reliability — especially in fringe coverage areas.
Inside the MediaTek M90
MediaTek’s M90 modem could mark a major turning point. It’s a next-gen 5G modem built on a high-efficiency architecture designed for stable signal management and low power use.
The M90 reportedly includes AI-driven signal optimization, allowing it to intelligently adjust to changing network conditions — something that could help prevent those sudden drops or stalls many Pixel users have experienced. It also supports advanced carrier aggregation and Sub-6 + mmWave 5G for smoother performance across more networks.
When stacked up against Samsung’s Exynos modems, the M90 looks far more refined. It even closes the gap with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X75, which currently leads in raw 5G performance and U.S. carrier compatibility.
Can It Fix Pixel’s Pain Points?
So, can the M90 actually solve Google’s modem headaches? Potentially — yes, at least on paper.
The M90’s smarter signal handling could bring stronger and more consistent reception, particularly in areas with fluctuating coverage. Its power-efficient design might also translate into better battery life and less heat buildup, especially under sustained 5G use.
Analysts say this could make a noticeable difference. If Google and MediaTek can properly integrate the M90 with the new Tensor G5, it could finally deliver the reliable connectivity Pixel fans have been asking for since 2021.
Of course, early performance data will tell the real story — but the specs suggest Google is learning from its past mistakes.
The Risk Factor
There’s still some risk in this move.
MediaTek, while improving rapidly, has limited optimization for U.S. carrier networks, which could pose challenges for Verizon and AT&T users in particular. Then there’s the integration hurdle — blending a MediaTek modem with Google’s in-house Tensor G5 platform won’t be simple.
Cost could also play a role. MediaTek’s chips are typically cheaper than Qualcomm’s, but integration and tuning might offset those savings. And if optimization isn’t perfect at launch, Google could find itself back where it started: with a great phone that struggles to stay connected.
Conclusion
The idea of a MediaTek-powered Pixel modem is exciting — and it might be exactly what Google needs to finally shed its connectivity curse. The M90 brings smarter AI management, more efficient power use, and potentially stronger 5G performance.
But execution will be everything. If Google nails the integration, the Pixel 11 could mark the end of one of its longest-running complaints. If not, even the best hardware won’t be enough to save it from history repeating itself.
Last Updated on October 18, 2025 by Lucy
